Introduction: EIP-4844 represents the cornerstone of Ethereum's Dencun Upgrade, marking a pivotal advancement in Ethereum's decentralized scaling roadmap. With the Dencun Upgrade going live on Ethereum Mainnet, EIP-4844's implementation introduces transformative changes to Layer 2 economics.
A. Overview
EIP-4844 introduces blob-carrying transactions—a novel data storage mechanism using Binary Large Objects (blobs). This innovation:
- Provides cost-efficient data availability for Layer 2 rollups
- Establishes infrastructure for future full sharding implementation
- Functions as a transitional scaling solution while maintaining Ethereum's security guarantees
Key characteristics:
- Blob data remains inaccessible to EVM execution (only verifiable via cryptographic commitments)
- Each blob offers ~0.125MB capacity (4096 field elements × 32 bytes)
- Temporary storage lifespan (~18.2 days) via sidecar architecture
👉 Explore how blobs revolutionize L2 economics
B. Historical Context
The Rollup Cost Dilemma
Current L2 solutions primarily expense comes from:
- Limited calldata storage (16 gas/byte)
- Permanent L1 storage requirements for temporary L2 data
| Metric | Data Source | Cost Driver |
|---|---|---|
| Typical L2 TX fee | l2fees.info | 70-85% calldata |
| OP Mainnet cost split | Dune Analytics | 92% L1 storage |
Proto-Danksharding as Bridge Solution
While data sharding (16MB/slot dedicated space) remains the long-term scaling answer, EIP-4844 delivers immediate relief through:
- Interim blob capacity: 0.375MB target/0.75MB max per block
- Future-proof design: Compatible transaction formats for full sharding
- Research credit: Named after Ethereum researchers Dankrad Feist and Proto Lambda
C. Technical Architecture
1. Blob Data Structure
ByteVector[n] where n = FIELD_ELEMENTS_PER_BLOB × BYTES_PER_FIELD_ELEMENT- FIELD_ELEMENTS_PER_BLOB: 4096 (fixed)
- BYTES_PER_FIELD_ELEMENT: 32 (fixed)
- Minimum retention: 4096 epochs (~18.2 days)
Components:
- Core payload: Actual L2 transaction batches
- Commitment scheme: KZG polynomial commitments for integrity verification
2. Transaction Format (EIP-2718 Compliant)
TransactionPayloadBody = [
chain_id, nonce, max_priority_fee_per_gas,
max_fee_per_gas, gas_limit, to, value,
data, access_list, max_fee_per_blob_gas,
blob_versioned_hashes, y_parity, r, s
]Key distinctions:
- Mandatory recipient address (
to ≠ nil) - Blob-specific fee market (
max_fee_per_blob_gas) - Versioned hashes for forward compatibility
3. Dual Gas Market Mechanism
| Parameter | Value | Description |
|---|---|---|
GAS_PER_BLOB | 131,072 | Gas units per blob |
TARGET_BLOB_GAS_PER_BLOCK | 393,216 | 3 blobs worth (0.375MB) |
MAX_BLOB_GAS_PER_BLOCK | 786,432 | 6 blobs capacity (0.75MB) |
BLOB_BASE_FEE_UPDATE_FRACTION | 3,338,477 | Adjustment rate parameter |
Fee calculation:
def get_blob_base_fee(excess_gas: int) -> int:
return fake_exponential(
MIN_BLOB_BASE_FEE,
excess_gas,
BLOB_BASE_FEE_UPDATE_FRACTION
)👉 Understand Ethereum's fee market evolution
D. Network Enhancements
Consensus Layer Changes
- Beacon chain: Modified block validation requiring blob availability
- P2P network: Blob sidecar propagation (decoupled from block bodies)
- Data sampling: Forward compatibility for DAS (Data Availability Sampling)
Execution Layer Validation
New checks include:
- Versioned hash prefix verification (
VERSIONED_HASH_VERSION_KZG = 0x01) - Blob count validation (
len(blob_versioned_hashes) > 0) - Cumulative blob gas accounting per block
// Pseudo-validation logic
assert block.header.blob_gas_used == sum(
GAS_PER_BLOB * len(tx.blob_versioned_hashes)
for tx in block.transactions
)E. Future Implications
The Sharding Roadmap
| Phase | Feature Set | Throughput |
|---|---|---|
| Proto-Danksharding | 0.75MB blobs, KZG commitments | 300-600 TPS (L2) |
| Full Danksharding | 16MB data shards, DAS implementation | 100,000+ TPS |
Rollup Integration Patterns
Optimistic Rollups:
- Fraud proofs with partial blob loading
- KZG proofs for step verification
ZK Rollups:
- Dual commitment scheme (blob + ZK)
- Equivalence proofs via point evaluation
FAQ: EIP-4844 Explained
Q: How does blob storage differ from calldata?
A: Blobs provide temporary, high-capacity storage (~18 days) at ~90% lower cost than permanent calldata storage.
Q: What prevents blob spam attacks?
A: The self-adjusting blob base fee follows EIP-1559 mechanics—excess usage exponentially increases costs.
Q: When will full sharding replace this?
A: Estimated 2-3 years post-Dencun, requiring PBS (Proposer-Builder Separation) and DAS implementation.
Q: How do nodes handle blob data?
A: Nodes store blobs as sidecars for minimum 4096 epochs before optional pruning, while only storing commitments permanently.
Q: Why versioned hashes?
A: Enables future KZG scheme upgrades without breaking existing rollup contracts.
Conclusion
EIP-4844 delivers immediate L2 scaling benefits while strategically aligning with Ethereum's sharding roadmap. By introducing:
- Cost-efficient blob transactions
- Decoupled data availability layers
- Future-proof cryptographic primitives
This upgrade catalyzes Ethereum's transition toward sustainable scalability without compromising decentralization. The Dencun Upgrade marks just the beginning—subsequent phases will further amplify throughput as the network matures.